← Back to Catalog

Must, need to, may, might

must-need-may-might

must (law) vs need to (admin) vs may/might (permission) — not “legally required to.” Don’t use can/could for permission (those mean ability).

Description

Canada.ca distinguishes obligation language carefully: must for law, need to for administrative requirements, and may or might for permission. Do not write “legally required to.” Do not use can or could for permission — those words mean ability, not leave to act. Apply when wording instructional obligations and permissions in Canada.ca copy. Fail “legally required to,” or can/could used where permission is meant.

When to use

Wording obligations and permissions in Canada.ca instructional copy.

Not when

Ability statements where can or could correctly means capability.

Agent hint

Write must / need to / may-might; avoid “legally required to” and can-for-permission.

Pass

Legal obligation = must; admin = need to; permission = may/might.

Fail

“Legally required to”; can/could used for permission.

Citations

Canada.ca — Content Style Guide

https://design.canada.ca/style-guide/index.html

Open UX · cited UX rules agents audit against

Privacy · Sources ·